Monday, September 24, 2012

US State Dept. blasts CNN report on Stevens' diary

Libyan President Mohammed el-Megarif speaks during a memorial service in Tripoli, Libya, Thursday, Sept. 20, 2012, for U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, and three consulate staff killed in Benghazi on Sept. 11. The deputy U.S. secretary of state has met senior Libyan officials in Tripoli and attended a memorial service for the American ambassador and three consulate staffers killed in an attack last week. William Burns is the most senior US official to visit Libya in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attack on the consulate in Benghazi and comes as Washington is still working to piece together how its top diplomat there, Ambassador Chris Stevens, was killed. Arabic on the poster reads, "thank you, Chris." (AP Photo/Abdel Magid al-Fergany)

Libyan President Mohammed el-Megarif speaks during a memorial service in Tripoli, Libya, Thursday, Sept. 20, 2012, for U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, and three consulate staff killed in Benghazi on Sept. 11. The deputy U.S. secretary of state has met senior Libyan officials in Tripoli and attended a memorial service for the American ambassador and three consulate staffers killed in an attack last week. William Burns is the most senior US official to visit Libya in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attack on the consulate in Benghazi and comes as Washington is still working to piece together how its top diplomat there, Ambassador Chris Stevens, was killed. Arabic on the poster reads, "thank you, Chris." (AP Photo/Abdel Magid al-Fergany)

LOS ANGELES (AP) ? CNN reported on the personal journal of slain American ambassador Christopher Stevens over objections from his family, a State Department spokesman said Saturday.

The news channel, in a story posted online Saturday, said that it found a journal belonging to Stevens four days after he died in a Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Three other Americans also were killed.

CNN broke a pledge to the late ambassador's family that it wouldn't report on the diary, said State Department spokesman Philippe Reines, a senior adviser to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

In a blistering statement, Reines called CNN's actions "indefensible."

The channel said in the story online that it took "newsworthy tips" from Stevens' diary and confirmed them with other sources. Citing an unidentified source "familiar with Stevens' thinking," CNN said that the ambassador was concerned about security threats in Benghazi and a "rise in Islamic extremism."

In a statement Saturday, CNN defended its use of the journal's contents and asked "why is the State Department now attacking the messenger."

"CNN did not initially report on the existence of a journal out of respect for the family, but we felt there were issues raised in the journal which required full reporting, which we did," the channel said.

The public has a right to know what CNN learned from "multiple sources" about fears and warnings of a terror threat before the Benghazi attack, the channel said, "which are now raising questions about why the State Department didn't do more to protect Ambassador Stevens and other U.S. personnel."

Stevens' family was informed within hours about the discovery of the journal, a hard-bound book that included seven handwritten pages. It was returned to them via a third party, according to CNN's online story.

An Italian official took control of the diary from CNN in Benghazi at the State Department's request, and it is en route back to Stevens' family, the department said.

"Given the truth of how this was handled, CNN patting themselves on the back is disgusting," Reines said in his statement.

"Whose first instinct is to remove from a crime scene the diary of a man killed along with three other Americans serving our country, read it, transcribe it, email it around your newsroom for others to read" and then call the family?" Reines asked.

In a phone call with the Stevens family, CNN "agreed to abide by the clear wishes of the Stevens family, and pledged not to use the diary or even allude to its existence until hearing back from the family," Reines said.

But four days later, "they just went ahead and used it," he said.

The diary was first mentioned on-air Friday by Anderson Cooper, following previous CNN reports that Stevens feared he was on an "al-Qaida hit list" but did not mention the journal. Cooper said that some of the information in the reports was based on Stevens' personal journal, which he said CNN came across in its reporting.

In its online story, CNN said it found the journal on the "floor of the largely unsecured consulate compound where he was fatally wounded."

Asked to comment on CNN's report that Stevens was concerned about a "hit list," Reines referred to a news conference last Thursday at which Clinton was asked about it.

"I have absolutely no information or reason to believe that there's any basis for that," Clinton had said.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2012-09-23-US-CNN-Stevens-Diary/id-10f8e9808a4646fbb0b52c820f5ba9d2

appeasement ian stewart ian stewart odom vt vt los angeles angels

TOC News ? Chee Soon Juan ? The Man and his Beliefs ? Part I

Chee Soon Juan ? The Man and his Beliefs ? Part I

Published by The Online Citizen on September 24, 2012

By Kumaran Pillai & Leo Khaw??

This is part 1 of a 4 part series -

Part I:???? Chee spoke about his brand of politics and why he chose a different strategy from the other opposition parties.?

? Part 2: ??? Chee?s views on the judiciary and about his moral consciousness.

Part 3:? ?? Is democracy a western philosophy or a Universal Principle? Can it be applied to Asian countries? Is there any evidence of Asia having practiced democracy in its early civilizations?

Part 4: ? ? What is the meaning of being socially liberal? Where Chee and SDP stand in their economic philosophies

The re-entry of Chee Soon Juan in local politics

Dr Chee Soon Juan, the caricature of opposition politics in Singapore is seldom portrayed in a positive light. Yet, he never fails to have a sparkle in his conversation about what the future holds. I caught up with him to discuss about his plans, his future, a little bit about his past and particularly about his proposal get out of bankruptcy.

His political strategy of going for broke, quite literally, has brought him into financial straits. Some have questioned his wisdom of doing this, while others think that a more subdued approach like how some of the other leading opposition figures have done would have been better.

I have often wondered if he knew what he was signing up for when he decided to enter politics twenty years ago. Whether politics was on his radar screen, how he got interested in politics, his rise to fame or infamy as some would have it? He has certainly paid a big price, a political one at that, which he needs to overcome in the next few years to establish himself as a player.

Below is the first of a four part series. It is an eye opener if you?ve not known anything about this man. Read it, and find out for yourself if the media has done justice to him, his ideas and philosophy.

?

KP:???? You have been in politics for over twenty years and it has been a very rocky ride. They have called you names, bankrupted you and made life extremely difficult for you. Yet, you have persevered. What keeps you going all these years?

CSJ: ??? The worst thing that can happen to any politician is to be ignored. If you?re ignored, it really means you are not doing your job right. In fact, they call you all these names because you are getting under their skin and they just don?t like it. Autocrats don?t know how to react to constructive criticism other than to? call you names.

In an autocratic system they also control the mass media and they may succeed with the whole name-calling part and smearing you for the time being. But, you know, you?ve got to persevere.

If you understand autocratic systems, and have some understanding of history, you'll find that people have been worse off than what they have done to me. Some of these people have been imprisoned, maligned, tortured and in some cases even killed! The word then is perseverance. Change doesn?t come without persistence and perseverance. And if we forget that, we won?t achieve what we?ve set out to do.

So look, all these years, they may think that they have gotten the better of me, and they seem to be winning, but you know that freedom and justice finally comes through.

?

KP:???? Prior to entering politics, you were a lecturer.? You owned a landed property, you were financially stable, and had a stable career.? Then it started going downhill because of your involvement in politics and your political beliefs. Do you have any regrets?

CSJ: ??? I?ve lost a lot, but I don?t see the losses in terms of finances. Sure, life has been hard but I never really regretted it.

I really enjoyed research work and I was getting publications into major journals.? In fact, I had one of my papers published in the SMJ, Singapore Medical Journal.? But, that?s another story. That?s one of my strengths and I really enjoyed it. So, to a certain extent, yes I do miss that!

But, when you compare it to what needs to be done ? and you?re talking about an entire society ? if there was no one speaking up, things can go very wrong very quickly. So, in that sense, no, I haven?t looked back and said that joining the SDP was something I shouldn?t have done.

There were difficult times, nonetheless, when I wished things were a little better.? But, that?s when I tell myself that anything that?s worth doing, is never easy.?

?

KP:???? What is your definition of success?? Would you say that success is only limited to electoral success or do you have a broader definition of success?

CSJ:???? I have never seen getting into parliament as the endpoint that is not what I perceive as success.? If we?ve not reformed the system, whereby there are proper checks and balances, where the media is not controlled where labour unions are free to form and organise, then, we haven?t achieved anything at all!?

We have just seen autocrats being displaced by another bunch of autocrats and history is just repeating itself.? So, for me at least, success means when we get into the position whereby the ruling party or the government is part of the story and not the story. When we have civil society representing the people or segments of the people and when we have a strong opposition, able and willing to take over the government? That is my definition of success.

?

KP: ??? Compared to the other political parties, you have taken a different tack. Do you think being more compliant would have been more successful in terms of getting a seat in parliament?

CSJ: ??? I cannot speak for them; I can only speak for myself.? If you?re a keen observer, you should be able to compare and contrast. We are not going to get anywhere if all we do is to rely on elections to bring about democratic change.?

In a democratic system, you have the media to report fairly on both sides. You look at what?s happening in the UK; you look at what?s happening in the US right now, both incumbent and the challenger get a lot of coverage in the main stream media. We hear about their views, on their policies, on their strategies and so on.

I?m talking about a fair media. That doesn?t exist here in Singapore. How do you begin to fight an election when half the people out there, in fact, the overwhelming majority out there, don?t know what?s going on?

?I challenge you to go out and do a survey right now. Has anybody heard of my book ?Democratically Speaking?? The news has been going around on the internet but the newspapers are completely silent.

So how would people know? And if they don?t know, how do you expect them to go to the voting booth; and say ?yes,? I think this party makes more sense than that party?s policy, that this is what I subscribe to and I think it?s better for our society and country, and then vote accordingly.

In a democratic society, political parties can hold a public assembly so that we can go out and talk to the people. In Singapore, if we walk into a university, NUS for example, and ask students to organise an event so that we can talk to young voters, we?ll get stopped. That limits our ability to reach out.? Honestly, how do we ask them to vote for us? So, election in, election out, the PAP "wins".

Now, when people don?t know what the issues are, about how PAP is intimidating us, about our lack of civil liberties, about our economic issues and problems, about our over-reliance on cheap foreign labour and GDP growth at all costs, then how do you expect them to make an informed choice when they vote?

That?s how PAP gets the mandate all the time. What I?m trying to say is: let us be smart about this. Where is the problem? The problem is that we don?t have our freedom and that includes a free media. We don?t have a free press that?s why the PAP gets a free ride into parliament all the time. No, they are not held accountable! Nothing is transparent here.

We have this big problem! If we have a problem, let's resolve it by getting to the root cause. Once all these things are taken care of, we don?t have to worry about elections. The candidate that makes the most sense, the candidate that can appeal to most, the best candidate gets elected into the government.

And on that score, I am absolutely confident that the kind of policies that we?ve been advocating, the people will understand it and when they know it, when they get to hear it, they'll support us.

We don?t have resort to jailing people, we don?t have to shut them up to win elections.

?

Chee spoke in a soft but firm voice. He spoke with conviction about his beliefs. He is there as a reminder of the artificial boundaries, or OB markers that have been setup by the PAP. They need to be challenged, he says, and overcome in order to reach a society that is free from the political, social and economic domination of a single party.

We went on to speak about a lot of other things, like the media, the judiciary and the economy, which will be covered in the other parts of this series.

Buy?a copy of?Democratically Speaking?or?Donate?to the Discharge CSJ Fund.

HELP keep the voice of TOC alive!

If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.

Do you have a flair for writing? Volunteer with us. Email us your full name and contact details to theonlinecitizen@gmail.com

Source: http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/09/chee-soon-juan-the-man-and-his-beliefs-part-i/

tcu football westminster bonnaroo 2012 lineup twisted metal sea lion si swimsuit 2012 westminster dog show

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Iran?s Revolutionary Guard says expects Israel to launch war

Yeganeh Torbati
Reuters
September 22, 2012

(Reuters) ? Israel will eventually go beyond threats and will attack Iran, the commander of Iran?s Revolutionary Guards was quoted as saying on Saturday.

As speculation mounts that Israel could launch air strikes on Iran before U.S. elections in November, Mohammad Ali Jafari told a news conference that the Jewish state would be destroyed if it took such a step.

?Their threats only prove that their enmity with Islam and the revolution is serious, and eventually this enmity will lead to physical conflict,? Jafari said when asked about Israeli threats to strike Iran?s nuclear facilities, the Iranian Students? News Agency (ISNA) reported.

?We are making all efforts to increase our defensive capabilities so that if there is an attack ? we could defend ourselves and other countries that need our help with high defensive capabilities.?

Full story here.


Print Print this page.

Comment Rules



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/irans-revolutionary-guard-says-expects-israel-to-launch-war.html

neurofibromatosis steve jobs fbi file suge knight obama birth control mortgage settlement macauly culkin joe namath

YOUTH TENNIS PLAY | Darien Sports & Recreation and Family

avonwalks: RT @DrMommyCalls: I fight breast cancer! What's your super power? @avonwalks

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://twitter.com/avonwalks/statuses/249689675504156674

dickclark gavin degraw gavin degraw alec time 100 bob beckel anna paquin

Saturday, September 22, 2012

PhoneGap Web Apps and Its Rich Trend-Setting History | Release ...

500 Internal Server Error

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@freereleasepress.smartspudmedia.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

Additionally, a 500 Internal Server Error error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.


Apache Server at freereleasepress.com Port 80

Source: http://freereleasepress.com/phonegap-web-apps-and-its-rich-trend-setting-history/

brian dawkins emma roberts north korea news north korea news giuliana and bill giuliana and bill bill rancic

Military-style tactics seen in U.S. Consulate siege

WASHINGTON (AP) ? The heavily armed extremists who laid siege to the U.S. Consulate in Libya used military-style tactics that may have steered Americans toward a waiting ambush, U.S. officials said Friday as they pieced together details about how the compound was overrun.

U.S. intelligence indicates that 50 or more people, many of them masked, were responsible for the Sept. 11 assault on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Gun trucks provided added firepower. The attackers set up a perimeter, controlling access in and out of the compound. A first wave of attacks sent the Americans fleeing to a fallback building, where a second group of extremists beset them with precise mortar fire.

Intelligence reports were still coming in, but officials told The Associated Press that what may have initially seemed like a protest over an anti-Islam movie that had spun out of control now showed the hallmarks of a more sophisticated operation.

In a country coming off a civil war, a level of battlefield savvy does not prove the attack on the compound was planned well in advance. How much planning went into the operation and whether it could have been detected or prevented remain unanswered questions, officials said.

The attacks killed Ambassador Chris Stevens, diplomat Sean Smith and two former Navy SEALs, who U.S. officials said were security officers guarding diplomatic officials. Stevens was visiting Benghazi from Tripoli to preside over the opening of an "American Space" cultural center.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss intelligence reports. They stressed that even now authorities do not have a clear understanding of exactly what happened in Benghazi. FBI agents from New York and Washington were in Libya investigating the attack.

"What happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack," Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Friday. "And we will not rest until we have tracked down and brought to justice the terrorists who murdered four Americans."

Officials have not singled out one responsible group, but have focused their attention on Ansar al-Shariah, a Libyan militant group led by a former detainee at the U.S. military-run prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Since the civil war that ousted Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi last year, the country has been awash with rebels, militias and terrorists. Weaponry is easy to come by, both from the former regime, from weapons depots looted during the war, and from foreign powers that armed the rebellion. The origin of the weapons used in the assault on the U.S. compound was unclear, officials said.

Whether the attack was premeditated carries both political and intelligence significance.

From an intelligence standpoint, the longer an operation was in the works ahead of the attack, the more the U.S. government will face scrutiny for not anticipating and preparing for it.

Politically, Republicans have accused President Barack Obama's administration of misreading the assault as an outgrowth of Middle East demonstrations over an American-made Internet video insulting the Islamic prophet Muhammad. They have also criticized the protection of the consulate, particularly since the attack fell on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, a date when authorities are normally on alert for attacks.

White House spokesman Jay Carney has said there was no evidence the attack was premeditated. Obama has said extremists used the protests as an excuse to attack.

A spontaneous protest that turns violent is harder to predict and respond to.

"The intelligence agencies are still not confident enough to represent to us whether it was planned in advance or taking the opportunity of a spontaneous protest," Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said Friday.

Investigators say some of the people involved have a "hodgepodge of affiliations with multiple militant groups," making it hard to hold one particular militia or movement responsible, said a senior U.S. intelligence official, speaking anonymously because he was not authorized to be quoted publicly describing the investigation.

Wanis al-Sharef, who was Libya's deputy interior minister until he was fired after the attacks, said a small group of lightly armed gunmen were the first to gather outside the compound. They were then joined by a crowd of civilians protesting the film. Finally, a larger group of heavily armed men arrived with gun vehicles and grenade launchers. That final group was responsible for the siege.

Ansar al-Shariah has repeatedly denied being any part of the attack, but eyewitnesses and security officials said the group's militiamen were among the gunmen who joined the demonstration outside the compound. The group claimed its fighters were only in the Benghazi area providing security at Jalaa Hospital. But that's more than three miles from the U.S. compound, which lies on the outskirts of the city in a rural area.

One witness said he was detained by Ansar al-Shariah members during the protest because he was taking pictures of one of their leaders.

Whoever they were, the attackers stormed the main building and set it on fire. One U.S. official described the militants striking the front of the building first, distracting security, while a second group struck then from the rear. Many people escaped and fled to an annex to the east.

About an hour after the assault began, American and Libyan forces retook control of the compound and brought everyone to the annex. Rescue teams headed their way.

Intelligence indicates the gunmen broke off into teams to block certain roads away from the compound, officials said. Whether that changed the route or otherwise influenced how the Americans moved through the streets remains unclear, but one U.S. official said the tactic was being looked at as an indication of battlefield strategy and sophistication.

As the Americans waited to be rescued from the annex, that building came under mortar fire. Mortars are short-range bombs that launch in high arcs. Aiming them can be a matter of trial and error. But U.S. officials said mortars were landing directly on the roof of the annex.

That, officials said, indicated an experienced fighter, a well-planned assault or both.

___

Associated Press writers Maggie Michael in Benghazi and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed to this report.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/military-style-tactics-seen-us-consulate-siege-201427277.html

limp bizkit stations of the cross nike foamposite galaxy bill maher seabiscuit dingo nba all star weekend